The role of Balanced Scorecard models in the assessment of Board of Directors performance
Main Article Content
Abstract
There are a number of performance management systems that are used as mechanisms to control corporate operations, and one of the well-known is the Balanced Scorecard. Business control is a fundamental issue, and the Board of Directors is an important internal control mechanism for improving the performance and competitiveness of corporations. The Board of Directors represents the link between the owner and the manager and his task is to constantly monitor the manager and to make sure that they carry out their activities in a way that will maximize profits for the owners of the capital. For the board to perform its role, its members need to have the appropriate competencies. The specific knowledge, skills, abilities and experiences of board members represent human capital. The subject of the research is to examine the possibility of applying the Balanced Scorecard model in the performance evaluation of the members of the Board of Directors and to examine the impact of the compensations of the board members, which are viewed as a factor of motivation and investment in human capital (HCE), on the financial performance of the company, namely the rate of return on the total invested capital and the total invested assets (ROE and ROA). The results of the research showed that the Balanced Scorecard is an applicable model for evaluating the performance of the members of the Board of Directors, and that the level of compensation of the board members is positively correlated with the financial performance of the company.
Keywords: Balanced Scorecard, Board of Directors, human capital, compensation of board members, financial performance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
References
Andriessen, D. 2011. “Making sense of intellectual capital: designing a method for the valuation of intangibles. New York: Routledge.
Alnacher, T. K., and Alhajjar, A. A. 2017. “Effect of human capital on organizational performance: a literature review”. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(8): 1154-1158.
Babić, V, and Slavković, M. 2016. “Kompetencije i dinamičke sposobnosti upravnih odbora kao faktor razvoja inovativnosti”. 6th South East European Meeting & Scientific Conference of Management Departments, Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Banja Luci: 235-251.
Berezinets, I., Garanina, T., and Ilina, Y. 2016. “Intellectual capital of a board of directors and its elements: introduction to the concepts“. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(4): 632-653.
Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and competitive advantage“. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Chavan, M. 2009. “The Balanced Scorecard: a new challenge“. Journal of Management Development, 28(5): 393-406.
Domanović, V. 2017. “Primena Balanced Scorecard modela u preduzećima u Šumadiji“. Uticaj globalizacije na poslovno upravljanje i ekonomski razvoj Šumadije i Pomoravlja, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Ekonomski fakultet: 215-229.
Edlin, B. 2005. “Quality not quantity needed on boards“. Chartered Accountants Journal: 33-34.
Epstein, M. J. and Roy, M. J. 2004. “How does your board rate“. Strategic Finance: 25-31.
Fitz Enz, J. 2000. “The ROI of human capital“. New York: American Management Association.
Ghorbanhosseini, M. 2013. “The effect of organizational culture, teamwork and organizational development on organizational commitment: the mediating role of human capital“. Tehnički Vjesnik, 20(6): 1019-1025.
Higgs, D. 2003. “Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors“. London: HMSO Department of Trade and Industry.
Hussein, A., and Mansour, M. E. 2017. “Evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards: the Balanced Scorecard approach“. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2): 167-195.
Hoque, Z. 2014. “20 years of studies on the Balanced Scorecard: trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research“. British Accounting Review, 46(1): 33-59.
Janošević, S., and Dženopoljac, V. 2015. “The impact of intellectual capital on companies’ market value and financial performance“. Ekonomika Preduzeća, 63: 354-371.
Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance“. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 1996. “Translating strategy into action: the Balanced Scorecard“. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R.S. and Nagel, M.E. 2004. “Improving corporate governance with the Balanced Scorecard“. Thai-American Business: 34-37.
Luthans, F., and Youssef, C.M. 2004. “Human’s, and now positive psychological capital management: investing in people for competitive advantage“. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2): 143-160.
Makkonen, T., Wiliams, A., and Habersetzer, A. 2018. “Foreign board members and firm innovativeness: an exploratory analysis for setting a research agenda“. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(6): 1057-1073.
MERITUM. 2002. “Guidelines form and reporting on intangibles, measuring intangibles to understand and improve innovation management“. Madrid: MERITUM.
Northcott, D., and Smith, J. 2011. “Managing performance at the top: a Balanced Scorecard for boards of directors“. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 7(1): 33-56.
Nguyen, T., Nguyen, A., Locke, S. and Reddy, K. 2017. “Does the human capital of board directors add value to firms? Evidence from an Asian market“. Journal Cogent Economics and Finance, 5(1): 1-17.
Parker, L.D. 2007. “Internal governance in the nonprofit boardroom: a participant observer study“. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5): 923-934.
Pulić, A. 2000. “VAIC-an accounting tool for IC management“. International Journal of Technology Management, 20: 702-714.
Starovic, D., and Marr, B. 2002. “Understanding corporate value: managing and reporting intellectual capital“. London: CIMA.
Saravanan, P., and Mayur, M. 2017. “Performance implications of board size, composition and activity: empirical evidence from the Indian banking sector“. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(3): 466-489.
Wang, Z., Wang, N. and Liang, H. 2014. “Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance“. Management Decision, 52(2): 230-258.
Yadav, S. and Chakraborty, A. 2017. “Board structure and value creation: a human capital efficiency approach. Globsyn Management Journal, 1(2): 1-10.