Peer-to-peer Networks and Complementary Goods: The Impact of Openness and Innovation on Profitable Piracy
Main Article Content
Abstract
File-sharing is often depicted as detrimental to traditional commercial activities and tends to dissuade official digital goods’ producers from innovating. Meanwhile, evidence shows that producers are likely to provide complementary hardware goods that are compatible with digital goods available both offline and online. This article investigates to what extent the introduction of peer-to-peer networks has a positive impact on the level of profits reached by producers.
Our model shows that the file-sharing activity does not crowd the official digital goods producers and hardware goods producers out of the market. Moreover, we find that there exists suitable quality-based strategies so that both types of producers benefit from the file-sharing activity. The utility that peer-to-peer networks provide to file-sharers has to be considered cautiously for commercial firms to gain positive outcomes from the file-sharing activity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
Authors reserve the copyright to published articles and have the right to use the article in the same manner like third parties in accordance with the licence Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY). Thereby they must quote the basic bibliographic data of the source article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, volume, pagination).
References
Bakos, Y. (2001) “The emerging landscape for retail e-commerce”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1): 69–80.
Besen, S. M. and S. N. Kirby (1989). “Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties”, Journal of Law and Economics, 32(2): 255–280.
Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S. and C. Rossi (2006). “Entry strategies under competing standards: hybrid business models in the open source software industry”, Management Science, 52(7): 1085–1098.
Bounie, D., Bourreau, M. and P. Waelbroeck (2005) “Pirates or explorers? Analysis of music consumption in french graduate schools”, working paper EC-05-01, ENST Paris, Paris, France.
Bourreau, M. and P. Labarthe-Piol (2004) “Le peer-to-peer et la crise de l’industrie du disque : une perspective historique”, Réseaux, 125: 17–54.
Brynjolfsson, E. and M. Smith (2000) “Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers”, Management Science, 46(4): 563–585.
Conner, K. R. and R. P. Rumelt (1991) “Software piracy – An analysis of protection strategies”, Management Science, 37 (2): 125–139.
Cunningham, B. M., Alexander, P. J. and N. Adilov (2004). “Peer-to-peer file sharing communities”, Information Economics and Policy, 16(2): 197–213.
Curien, N., and F. Moreau (2004) “The introduction of electronic commerce with product differentiation: when local monopolists go online”, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers working paper, CNAM, Paris, France.
Dahlander, J. and M. G. Magnusson (2005) “Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from nordic firms”, Research Policy, 34(4): 481–493.
Domon, K. and N. Yamazaki (2004) “Unauthorized file-sharing and the pricing of digital content”, Economic Letters, 85(2): 179–184.
Flowers, S. (2008) “Harnessing the hackers: the emergence and exploitation of outlaw innovation”, Research Policy, 37(2): 177–193.
Gayer, A. and O. Shy (2003a) “Internet and peer-to-peer distributions in markets for digital products”, Economic Letters, 81(2): 51–57.
Gayer, A. and O. Shy (2003b) “Copyright protection and hardware protection”, Information Economics and Policy, 15(4): 467–483.
Gayer, A. and O. Shy (2006) “Publishers, artists, and copyright enforcement”, Information Economics and Policy, 18(4): 374–384.
Gopal, R. D., Bhattacharjee, S. and G. L. Sanders (2006). “Do artists benefit from online music sharing”, Journal of Business, 79(4): 1503–1534.
Gopal, R. D., Sanders, G. L., Bhattacharjee, S., Agrawal, M. and S. C. Wagner (2004) “A behavioral model of digital music piracy”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14(2): 89–105.
King, P. S., and R. Lampe (2003) “Network externalities, price discrimination and profitable piracy”, Information Economics and Policy, 15(3): 271–290.
Krishnan, R., Smith, M. D., Tang, Z. and R. Telang (2004) “An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music sharing networks”, Information Systems Research, 15(2): 155–174.
Krishnan, R., Smith, M. D., Tang, Z. and R. Telang (2007) “Digital business models for peer-to-peer networks: Analysis and economic issue”, Review of Network Economics, 6(2): 194–213.
Krishnan, R., Smith, M. D. and R. Telang (2003) “The economics of peer-to-peer networks”, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Applications, 5(3): 31–44.
Liebowitz, S. J. (1985) “Copying and indirect appropriability: photocopying of journals”, Journal of Political Economy, 93(5): 945–957.
Liebowitz, S. J. (2005) “Pitfalls in measuring the impact of file-sharing”, CESifo Economic Studies, 51(2-3): 435– 473.
Liebowitz, S. J. (2006) “File-sharing: creative destruction or just plain destruction?”, Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1): 1–28.
Oberholzer, F. and K. Strumpf (2004) “The effect of file sharing on record sales: an empirical analysis”, working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Peitz, M. and P. Waelbroeck (2004) “The effect of internet piracy on music sales: cross-section evidence”, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 1(2): 71–79.
Peitz, M. and P. Waelbroeck (2005) “An economist’s guide to digital music”, CESifo Economic Studies, 51(2-3): 363–432.
Peitz, M. and P. Waelbroeck (2006a) “Piracy of digital products: a critical review of the theoretical literature”, Information Economics and Policy, 18(4): 449–476.
Peitz, M. and P. Waelbroeck (2006b) “Why the music industry may gain from free downloading – The role of sampling”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 907–913.
Poddar, S. (2005) “Network externality and commercial software piracy”, working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Rochelandet, F. and F. Le Guel (2005) “P2P music-sharing networks: why legal fight against copiers may be inefficient?”, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2(2): 69–82.
Shah, S. (2006) “Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development”, Management Science, 52(7): 1000–1014.
Shapiro C. and H. R. Varian (1998) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Shy, O. (1996) Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shy, O. (2001) The Economics of Network Industries, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Shy, O. and J. F. Thisse (1999) “A strategic approach to software protection”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8(2): 163–190.
Takeyama, L. N. (1994) “The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of network externalities”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2): 155–166.
Toffler, A. (1980) The Third Wave, New York, NY: William Morrow and Co..
von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zentner, A. (2006) “Measuring the effect of music downloads on music purchases”, Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1): 63–90.