Digital Development of Serbia Compared to Selected European Countries: A Comparative Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this research is to analyze the level of digital development achieved by sixteen European countries based on Microsoft’s Digital Future Index from 2021. The countries analyzed in the report are classified into three groups: a) Digitally Advanced “Benchmark” Countries of Western Europe (the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, and Finland), b) Europe’s Fast-Growing Digital Leaders (Czech Republic, Estonia, Malta, Slovenia, and Portugal), and c) Digital Followers of Central & Eastern Europe (Croatia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, and Greece). By applying comparative graphical analysis, using a 45-degree line, the relationship between the Level of Digital Development and the Benefits of Digitization in these countries was examined. The findings indicate that economies with a relatively lower Digital Development Score achieved relatively higher Economic and Social Gains Scores. This highlights the need for more efficient management of digitalization factors in countries leading the digital development process. Furthermore, the inputs to the development of digitization and the economic and social results of achieved digital development were visually compared both for the three previously identified groups of European countries and specifically for the Republic of Serbia. The research findings demonstrate that the digital Followers of Central & Eastern Europe significantly lag behind the “Benchmark” countries of Western Europe and Europe’s fast-growing digital leaders in terms of achieved digitalization levels. Serbia lags in the development of digital infrastructure, digital skills, the adoption of digital technologies, and the overall level of human capital development compared to other European countries.
Article Details
Section
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
References
An. Q., Wang, R., Wang, Y., & Pavel, K. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on sustainable development: evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1341471. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1341471
Bataev, A., & Aleksandrova, A. (2020). Digitalization of the World Economy: Performance Evaluation of Introducing Cyber-Physical Systems. 9th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), pp. 265-269. Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1109/ICITM48982.2020.9080378
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0039
Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics Working Paper, 68. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431732
CEE Multi-Country News Center. (n.d.). Digital Futures Index Archives. Microsoft. Retrieved fromhttps://news.microsoft.com/en-cee/tag/digital-futures-index/
European Commission. (2024). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
Digital Serbia Initiative. (2025). Digital Serbia Initiative Strategy 2025–2027. https://www.dsi.rs/en/digital-serbia-initiative-strategy-2025-2027
Dornberger, R., Inglese, T., Korkut, S., & Zhong, VJ (2018). Digitalization: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. In: Dornberger, R. (eds) Business Information Systems and Technology 4.0. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 141. Springer, Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74322-6_1
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.12691/jbms-10-4-3
Gao, D., Li, G., & Yu, J. (2022). Does digitization improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from Chinese 213 cities. Energy, 247, 123395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123395
Government of the Republic of Serbia. (2021). Action Plan for the Implementation of the Digital Skills Development Strategy (2021–2022). https://mit.gov.
Government of the Republic of Serbia. (2020). Strategy for the Development of Digital Skills in the Republic of Serbia for the Period 2020–2024. https://mit.gov.rs
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2017). ICT Development Index 2017. Retrieved fromhttps://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html
Lee, Y. Y., & Falahat, M. (2019). The impact of digitalization and resources on gaining competitive advantage in international markets: Mediating role of marketing, innovation and learning capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1211
Li, J. (2024). Examining the impact of digital financial inclusion on economic development in urban and rural areas of China using remote sensing. GeoJournal 89, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11005-w
Microsoft News Centre Europe. (n.d.). Learning from “Digital Frontrunners” will help us grow business competitiveness and our quality-of-life. https://news.microsoft.com/europe/features/digital-futures-index/
Mishra, R., Singh, R. K., & Papadopoulos, T. (2022). Linking digital orientation and data-driven innovations: A SAP–LAP linkage framework and research propositions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, PP(99), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3153588
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48, Article 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Nedić, V., Cvetanović, S., & Despotović, D. (2014). ICT as a component of knowledge economy development of Western Balkan countries. Industry, 42(4), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija42-4602
Niu, X., Ma, Z., Ma, W., Yang, J., & Mao, T. (2024). The spatial spillover effects and equity of carbon emissions of the digital economy in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139885
Sanders, N. R., Boone, T., Ganeshan, R., & Wood, J. D. (2019). Sustainable supply chains in the age of AI and digitization: Research challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12224
Shkarlet, S., Dubyna, M., Shtyrkhun, K., & Verbivska, L. (2020). Transformation of the paradigm of the economic entities development in digital economy. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 16, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2020.16.41
Singgalen, Y. A., Sasongko, G., & Wiloso, P. G. (2019). Community participation in regional tourism development: A case study in North Halmahera Regency - Indonesia. Insights into Regional Development, 1(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.4(3)
United Nations. (2020). E-Government Development Index. Retrieved fromhttps://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center
Wang, L., & Chen, L. (2024). Resource dependence and air pollution in China: Do the digital economy, income inequality, and industrial upgrading matter? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 2069–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02802-9
Wignaraja, G., Krüger, J., & Tuazon, AM (2016). Production networks, profits, and innovative activity: evidence from Malaysia and Thailand. Springer
World Bank. (2016). The Digital Adoption Index 2016. Retrieved fromhttps://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016/Digital-Adoption-Index
Wu, B., & Yang, W. (2022). Empirical test of the impact of the digital economy on China's employment structure. Finance Research Letters, 49, Article 103047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103047
Xie, W., Wang, T., & Zhao, X. (2020). Does digital inclusive finance promote coastal rural entrepreneurship? Journal of Coastal Research, 103(SP1), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.2112/si103-052.1
Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., & Geng, Y. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96(3), Article 106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106821