Strategic Management Theory: Concepts, Analysis and Critiques in Relation to Corporate Competitive Advantage from the Resource-based Philosophy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concepts, theory and practice of strategic management have become prominent in modern management literature especially in this new millennium for one obvious reason: that is, because of the complex, nebulous and dynamic nature of contemporary corporate governance. This phenomenon has in turn become a matter of concern to academics and professionals alike on the field. Consequently, the main objective of this paper is to present an overview of strategic management with particular emphasis on its concepts, theory as well as its linkage with the resource-based philosophy of the firm’s competitive advantage. A review of the relevant literature was conducted and a connection between strategic management theory and competitive advantage from the recourse-based philosophy of the firm was identified. It was found that the resource-based model is one of the main strategic management theories applicable to explain organizational performance, and it is also a part of the larger management theory family which has evolved to suit the managerial requirements of the modern complex organizations and also the business environments within which the organizations operate. Examining organizational competitive advantage from this school of thought allows the organizations to measure the significance of its internal resources and capabilities in particular towards attaining a competitive advantage, and hence to provide further support and extension to the Philosophical approach.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
Authors reserve the copyright to published articles and have the right to use the article in the same manner like third parties in accordance with the licence Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY). Thereby they must quote the basic bibliographic data of the source article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, volume, pagination).
References
Afuah, A. (2002). Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and Competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 171-179
Ainuddin, R.A., Beamish, P.W., Hulland, J.S. and Rouse, M.J. (2007). Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 42 (2007) pp. 47- 60.
Arend, R.J. (2003). Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage.Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp. 279-284 (2003).
Armstrong, C.E. and Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on theresource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 959-986.
Barney, J.B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science. Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1231-1241.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.
Barney, J.B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 49-61.
Barney, J. B. (2001a). Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 41-56.
Barney, J.B. (2001b). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27 (2001): pp. 643-650.
Barney, J.B. (2007). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Barney, J.B., Wright, M. and Ketchen, D.J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27 (2001): pp. 625-641.
Burden, R. and Proctor, T. (2000). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage through training. Team Performance Management, Vol. 6 No. 5/6, 2000, pp. 90-97.
Carter, R. and Hodgson, G.M. (2006). The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 461-476.
Cole, G.A. (2004). Management Theory and Practice, Sixth Edition. Thomson Learning, United Kingdom.
Colotla, I., Shi, Y. and Gregory, M.J. (2003). Operation and Performance of international manufacturing networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1184-1206.
Conner, K.R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 121-154.
Cousins, P.D. (2005). The alignment of appropriate firm and supply strategies for Competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2005, pp. 403-428.
Das, R. (1997). Defending against MNC offensives: Strategy of the large domestic firm in a newly liberalizing economy. Management Decision, Vol. 35 No. 8, 1997, pp. 605-618.
David, F.R. (2005). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, Tenth Edition. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education International, 2005.
De Pablos, P.O. (2006). Transnational corporations and strategic challenges: An analysis of knowledge flows and competitive advantage. The Learning Organization, Vol. 13 No. 6, 2006, pp. 544-559.
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 12, December 1989, 1504-1511.
DuBrin, A.J. (2006). Essentials of Management, 7th Edition. Thomson South-Western, U.S.A.
Fahy, J. (2000). The resource-based view of the firm: some stumbling-blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24/2/3/4 [2000] 94-104.
Fahy, J., Farrelly, F. and Quester, P. (2004). Competitive advantage through sponsorship: A conceptual model and research propositions. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 8, 2004, pp. 1013-1030.
Falshaw, J.R., Glaister, K.W. and Ekrem, T. (2006). Evidence on formal strategic planning and company performance. Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 1, 2006, pp. 9-30.
Flint, G.D. and Van Fleet, D.D. (2005). A comparison and contrast of Strategic Management and Classical Economic concepts: Definitions, comparisons, and pursuit of advantages. Journal of Business Inquiry, 2005. Utah Valley State College, USA.
Foss, N.J. and Knudsen, T. (2003). The resource-based tangle: Towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 291-307.
Goerzen, A. and Beamish, P.W. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1289-1306 (2003).
Goh, A. (2004). Enhancing organizational performance through knowledge innovation: A proposed strategic management framework. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, October 2004.
Gottschalg, O. and Zollo, M. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 418-437.
Gupta, A. and McDaniel, J. (2002). Creating competitive advantage by effectively managing knowledge: A framework for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, October 2002.
Haim Hilman Abdullah (2005). Pengurusan Strategik. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., 2005.
Hambrick, D.C. and Chen, M.J. (2008). New academic fields as admittance-seeking social movements: The case of strategic management. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No.1, pp. 32-54.
Hennart, J.F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 483-497.
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2001). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 479-491 (2001).
Hult, G.T.M. and Ketchen, D.J., Jr. (2001). Does market orientation matter?:A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22: pp. 899-906.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 23-32.
King, A. (2007a). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A Transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 889-900.
King, A.W. (2007b). Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No.1, 156-178.
King, D.R., Covin, J.G. and Hegarty, W.H. (2003). Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovations. Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 589-606.European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 11, Number 3 (2009) 416
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4, pg. 625.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (2003). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 516-529.
Kristandl, G. and Bontis, N. (2007). Constructing a definition for intangibles using the Resource based view of the firm. Management Decision, Vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 1510-1524.
Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G., Wright, P. and Kroll, M. (2006). Paradox and theorizing within the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 2006, Vol.31, No.1, pp. 115-131.
Leiblein, M.J. (2003). The choice of organizational governance form and performance: Predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories. Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 937-961.
Liao, S.H. and Hu, T.C. (2007). Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry. Technovation, 27 (2007) 402-411.
Lin, B.W. (2003). Technology transfer as technological learning: a source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources. R&D Management, 33, 3, 2003. 327-341.
Ma, H. (1999a). Anatomy of competitive advantage: a SELECT framework. Management Decision, Vol. 37 No. 9, 1999, pp. 709-718.
Ma, H. (1999b). Creation and preemption for competitive advantage. Management Decision, Vol. 37 No. 3, 1999, pp. 259-267.
Ma, H. (2000). Competitive advantage and firm performance. Competitiveness Review, 2000, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p16, 17p.
Ma, H. (2004). Toward global competitive advantage: Creation, competition, cooperation and co-option. Management Decision, Vol. 42 No. 7, 2004, pp. 907-924.
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 387-401 (2001).
Mazzarol, T. and Soutar, G.N. (1999). Sustainable competitive advantage for educational institutions: a suggested model. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, 1999, pp. 287-300.
Meyer, K.E. (2006). Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 23, pp. 119-137.
Miller, D. (2003). An asymmetry-based view of advantage: Towards an attainable sustainability. Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp. 961-976 (2003).
Mills, J., Platts, K. and Bourne, M. (2003). Competence and resource architectures. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2003, pp. 977- 994.
Mohd Khairuddin Hashim (2005). Strategic Management. Thomson Learning, Singapore. [59] Newbert, S.L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, pp. 121-146 (2007).
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and Resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18:9, pp. 697-713 (1997).
O’Shaughnessy, N.J. (1996). Michael Porter’s Competitive Advantage revisited. Management Decision, Vol. 34 No. 6, 1996, pp. 12-20.
Pan, Y. and Chi, P. (1999). Financial performance and survival of Multinational Corporations in China. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1999, pp. 359-374.
Peng, M.W., Lee, S.H. and Tan, J.J. (2001). The keiretsu in Asia: Implications for multilevel theories of competitive advantage. Journal of International Management, Vol. 7, pp. 253-276.
Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 1993, pp. 179-191.
Peteraf, M.A. and Barney, J.B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 309-323.
Peteraf, M.A. and Bergen, M.E. (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A Market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, 2003, pp. 1027-1041.
Porter, M.E. (1981). The contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 6, No. 4, 1981, pp. 609-620.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.
Porter, M.E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(8): 95-117, Winter 1991.
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December 2006.
Powell, T.C. (2003). Strategy without ontology. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 24, pp. 285-291.
Prahalad, C.K. and Lieberthal, K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, July-August 1998, pp. 69-79.
Priem, R.L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of ManagementReview, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 219-235.
Priem, R. L. and Butler, J. E. (2001a). Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22-40.
Priem, R. L. and Butler, J. E. (2001b). Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comment. Academy of Management Review, 26: 57-66.
Ramsay, J. (2001). The resource based perspective, rents, and purchasing’s contribution to sustainable competitive advantage. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Summer 2001, pp. 38-47.
Richard, O.C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy and firm performance: A Resourcebased view. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 164-177.
Rodriguez, J.L. and Rodriguez, R.M.G. (2005). Technology and export behaviour: A Resource-based view approach. International Business Review, Vol.14, pp. 539-557.
Ruzita Jusoh and Parnell, J.A. (2008). Competitive strategy and performance measurement In the Malaysian context: An exploratory study. Management Decision, Vol.46, No.1, 2008, pp. 5-31.
Sapienza, H.J., Autio, E., George, G. and Zahra, S.A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 914-933.
Sheehan, N.T. and Foss, N.J. (2007). Enhancing the prescriptiveness of the resource-based view through Porterian activity analysis. Management Decision, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 450-461.
Sheldrake, J. (2003). Management Theory, Second Edition. Thomson Learning, United Kingdom.
Svensson, G. (2006). A quest for a common terminology: the concept of born glocals. Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 9, 2006, pp. 1311-1317.
Verbeke, A. (2003). The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 498-504.
Watson, K.J., Blackstone, J.H. and Gardiner, S.C. (2007). The evolution of a management philosophy: The theory of constraints. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, pp. 387-402.
Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No.3, pp. 277-305. European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 11, Number 3 (2009) 418
Yoo, J.W. and Choi, Y.J. (2005). Resource substitution: Why an effective late-mover strategy? Journal of Management Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 91-100.
Yu, T.Y. and Cannella, A.A., Jr. (2007). Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 665-686.
Zainal Abidin Mohamed (2005). Pengurusan Strategik. Siri Pengurusan dan Pentadbiran Utusan. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur.