Absorption Capacity of European Union Pre-accession Programs in Croatia

Main Article Content

Vladimira Ivandić
Vinko Kandžija
Jelena Kandžija


The utilization of European Union (EU) financial assistance is one of the central issues for Member States, as well as Candidate Countries like Croatia. In order to fully gain from the allocated resources of the EU budget, each country needs an adequate absorption capacity (AC). This article is about the absorption capacity of EU pre-accession programs in Croatia. The absorption capacity of EU pre-accession assistance is seen from two theoretical standpoints: the first originates from development economics, while the second developed from the theory of multilevel governance (MLG). The purpose of this article is to analyse the factors / determinants of absorption capacity, and the implementation of pre-accession programs in Croatian municipalities. In order to test the relation of AC and implementation (usage) of the EU funds, an empirical multivariable regression model of AC was established. The empirical estimation confirmed the expected positive correlation between the AC and EU funds. Another key issue that was discovered is that AC is very much a dynamic concept in the sense that ability to use EU funds changes over time, in response to a variety of endogenous and exogenous factors. As such, it calls for broader analysis and presents a challenge for further work on the subject.

Article Details



Bache, I. 2004. “Multi – level Governance and the European Union Regional Policy.” In Multilevel Governance, : Bache, Ian and Flinders, Matthev, 165-176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bahovec, V., and Erjavec, N. 2009. Uvod u ekonometrijsku analizu. Zagreb: Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Element.
Begg, I. 1999. „EU Investment Grants Overwiev.” Worl Bank Tehnical paper 435.
Bourguignon, F., and Sundberg, M. 2006. “Absortive capacity and Achieving the MDGs.” Helsinki, United nations University, World Institute for Development Economic Research Research paper 2006/47.
Clemens, M., and Redelet, S. 2003. “Absortive capacity: How Much is too much”, in: Challening Foreign aid: A Policymakers Guide to the Millennium Challenge Account, ed. Radelet, Steven, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Collier, P., and Dollar, D. 2002. “Aid allocation and poverty reduction.” European Economic Rewiev, 46(8): 1475-1500.
Collier, P., and Dollar, D.. 2004. “Development Effectiveness: What have we learnt., Economic Journal, 114(496):. 44-71.
Dalgaard, C. J., and Hansen, H. 2004. ”On the Empirics of Foreign aid and Growth.” Economic Journal, 114: 191-216.
De Renzio, P. 2005. “Incentives for harmonisation and Alignment in Aid Agencies”, ODI, London Working paper, No. 248
Dollar, D., and Pritchett, l. 1998. “Assessing Aid: What works, what doesn’t and why.” Washington, World Bank Policy research report.
Hagen, T., and Mohl, P. 2009. “Econometric Evaluation of the EU Cohesion policy – A Survey.” ZEW Centre for European Economic Research Discussion paper, No. 09-052
Hansen, H. 2001. “Aid and Growth Regression.” Journal of Development Economics, 64(2): 547-550.
Heller, P., and Gupta, S. 2002. “Challenges in Expanding aid Flows.” IMF Policy Wasgington, D.C. Discussion paper.
Herve, Y., and Holzmann, R. 1998. Fiscal transfers and Economic convergence in the EU – An analysis of absorption problems and evaluation of the Literature. Baden – Baden: NOMOS.
Hooghe, L., and Marks, G. 2001. Multi – level governance and European integration. Littlefield publishers.
Horvat, A. 2003. “Absorption problems in the European union’s structural Funds focusing on administrative absorption capacities in the candidate countries.” PhD diss. Vienna University of Economics and Bussiness administration.
Horvat, A. 2004. Absorption Problems in the EU Structural Funds. Some Aspects regarding Administrative Absorption Capacity in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Ljubljana: National Agency for Regional Develeopment.
Horvat, A. 2005. “Why nobody care about absorption” Some aspects regarding administrative absorption capacity for the EU structural Funds in Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia before accession”, Vienna, WIFO Working papers, No. 258.
Kmenta, J. 1997. Počela ekonometrije.2nd ed. Zagreb: Mate.
Milio, Simona. 2007. “Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances. Evidence from structural funds implementation in southern Italy.” Regional studies, 41(4): 429-442.
Ministarstvo financija. 2012. Hrvatska u Europi, Europa za Hrvatsku. 2nd ed. Zagreb.
Mrak, M., and Tilev, D. 2008. ”Absorption for EU Pre-accession funds: Concept and implication for Kosovo”, Forum 2005., Priština.
Radelet, S. 2003. Challenging foreign aid: A policymaker’s gudie to millennium challenge account.” Washington: Centre for global development.
State statistical office publication on BDP. “Priopćenje BDP za Republiku Hrvatsku, prostorne jedinice za statistiku 2. razine i županije u 2009.”, No. 12.
Rosenstein – Rodan, P. 1961. “International aid for Underdeveloped countries.” The Rewiev of economics and statistics, 43(2): 107-138.
Šumpikova, M., Pavel, J., and Klazar, S. 2003. ”EU Funds: Absorption capacity and Effectiveness of their use.” With focus on regional level in Czech Republic, University of Economics Working paper, No. 402.
Tatar, M. 2010. “Estonian local government absorption capacity of EU structural funds”. Halduskultuur – administrative culture, 11(2): 202-226.
World Bank. 2004. “Aid effectiveness and financing modalities”, paper prepared for Development committee Meeting, Washington.