Well-Being – Resorces, Happiness and Capabilities:Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is two-fold. On the one hand, it aims at presenting discussion on advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to well-being, its indicators and measures. On the other, it aims at presenting empirical evidence on the level of well-being of the peoples in the Western Balkan region. Although resources are necessary for the good-quality life, personal well-being cannot be fully assessed by looking only at the resources people have command of. The alternatives are to focus on people’s subjective well-being, then to create certain objective measure of well-being, as the one within human development approach, or the combination of the two, as within gross national happiness concept or happy planet approach. According to the available data on well-being in the countries of the Western Balkan region for 2012, Croatia is the only country in the region that belongs to a group of upper middle income countries, and which also records high human development. The others are middle income countries with medium level of human development. It is interesting noticing that Albania, which is with Bosnia and Herzegovina at the bottom of the list based on the gross national income (GNI) per capita and human development index (HDI), is region’s leader in the happy planet index (HPI), and among top 20 countries in the world based on this indicator, particularly due to low level of ecological footprint. According the data on the subjective well-being, we can notice that the greatest satisfaction with one’s life is experienced by the people in Croatia. It is also noticeable that reportedly more people in the Western Balkans experience positive feelings than they feel the negative.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
References
Bentham, J. 1982. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Methuen.
Deneulin, S. and Shahani, L. (ed.). 2009. An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency, London: Human development and capability association.Ed Diener, Richard E.Lucas, and Shigehiro Oshi.
Diener, Ed, Lucas, Richard E. and Oishi, S. 2002. „Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction“ in C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford and New York : Oxford University Press.
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., and Sachs, J. (ed.) 2012, World Happiness Report. Earth Institute.
Jahan, S. 2002. „Evolution of the human development index”. In Readings in Human Development concepts, measures, and policies for a development paradigm (2004) edited by Fukuda-Parr, Skaiko, Kumar, Shiva, (2004), New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 128–140.
Mill, J. S. 2000. Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radovanovic Bojana. 2011. „Human Development Index as a Measure of Human Development.” Philosophy and Society, 3/2011: 193-208.
Sen, A. 1979. Equality of what? The tanner lecture on human values.
Sen, A. 1989. „Development as capability expansion.” In Readings in Human Development concepts, measures, and policies for a development paradigm (2004) edited by Fukuda-Parr, Skaiko, Kumar, Shiva, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–17.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russel, D. 2012. „Virtue ethics, happiness and the good life” in Companion to Virtue Ethics edited by Russel, Daniel, Cambridge University Press, pp. 7-29.
Spence, R. 2009. „Economic growth.” In An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency, London: Human development and capability association.
Ul Haq, M. 1995. „The human development paradigm”, in Readings in Human Development edited Readings in Human Development concepts, measures, and policies for a development paradigm (2004) by Fukuda-Parr, Skaiko, Kumar, Shiva, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ul Haq, M. 1999. Reflections on human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNDP. 1990. Human Development Report.
UNDP. 2012. Human Development Report.
http://www.happyplanetindex.org/ (accessed August 2013)
http://www.balkan-monitor.eu (accessed August 2013)
http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/ (accessed August 2013)