The Limits of the Scientific Method in Economics and Business: A Critical View
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the limits of scientific method in economic research.In the paper is pointed out that despite the scientific method, which encounters a great applicability in economics and business, when forecasting future economic developments in question, its capabilities is very limited. Therefore, the modern scientific method should synthesize rationalism and empiricism In this context, the paper concludes with the assumption that knowledge of mathematical logic, including all its abilities, is in itself highly valuable and is an important supplement to the already existing scientific methodology that cannot be ruled out in economic research.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
Authors reserve the copyright to published articles and have the right to use the article in the same manner like third parties in accordance with the licence Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY). Thereby they must quote the basic bibliographic data of the source article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, volume, pagination).
References
Babbie, E. 1998. The Practice o!Ebcial Research, 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Beckert, J. 2013a. “Capitalism as a System of Expectations: Toward a Sociological Microfoundation of Political Economy.” Politics and Society, 41(3), 323-350.
Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. 2nd edition, Creative Commons Attribution, Florida.
Duhs, L.A. 2006. “Is economic philosophy a subject worth teaching?” Australasian Journal of Economics Education. 3(1 & 2).
Edesess, M. 2012. An Attack on Paul Krugman. Advisor Perspectives. http://www.advisorperspectives.com/newsletters12/20-krugman2.php
Friedman, M. 1953. "The Methodology of Positive Economics." In The Methodology of Positive Economics, 3-43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3-43.
Goldsmith, E. 2000. Is science neutral? The Ecologist, Vol. 30, No. 3, May 2000.
Hagan, F. E. 1993. Research Methods in CriminalJustlce and Criminology, 3rd ed. New York Macmillan.
Heilbroner, R. 1996. “The Embarrassment of Economics”. Challenge, Nov/Dec, 46-49.
Ioannides, S., Nielsen, K. 2007. Economics and the Social Sciences: Boundaries, Interaction and Integration. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jacobs, J., Nagan, W., Zucconi, A. 2014. “Unification in the Social Sciences: Search for a Science of Society.” Cadmus, 2(3 October 2014): 1-22.
Kulić, M. 2009. Finansijska i ekonomska načela oporezivanja, Škola biznisa. Na internetu: http://www.vps.ns.ac.rs/SB/2009/2.6.pdf
Kuznets, S. 1966. Modern Economic Growth. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Martin, R. 2011. The limits of the scientific method in economics and the world.Reuters. http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/11/10/a-better-blueprint-for-economics/ (Retrived:27 October ,2015).
McCloskey, D. 2005. History of Economic Ideas. XIII (3,2005):85-102.
Poli, R. 2014. “Anticipation: A New Thread for the Human and Social Sciences?” Cadmus, 2(3, October 2014): 22-49.
Radović, M. 1996. ”Ekonomska analiza na novim (kvantitativnim) osnovama” U Uvod u metode ekonomske analize-teorijsko filozofske osnove naučnog metoda, ur. Aničić. R. Ekonomski fakultet u Beogradu.
Robinson, Dž. 1981. Ekonomska filozofija. Beograd, Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije.
Robinson, Dž. 1962. Economic Philosophy.Watts, London
Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Senese, J. D. 1997. ApplJed REsearc h Methods in Crimi nal Justice. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Walras, L. 2010. Elements of Pure Economics. Routledge Library Editions: Economics.
Varian, H. 1989. Handbook of Industrial Organization. Vol. 1, pp. 597-654.