Statistical Monitoring of Innovation Capacities of the Serbian Firms as Decision- Making Tool

Main Article Content

Marija Mosurović Ružičić
Đuro Kutlača


The subject of this paper is to underline the importance of using data obtained via the official statistical reports that is based on Oslo manual methodology manual (Community Innovation Survey) for strategic decision making both at the national level as well as at the level of the company. These data enable monitoring and evaluating the innovation capacity of the firms with the aim of improving it. The paper, also, points out the importance of the firm's innovation capacity assessment as an impeller of economic development based on knowledge.  By the data obtained by presented methodology, national decision makers can clearly comprehend and improve the direction of innovation policy and its integration into the wider policy framework that encourage economic development based on innovation.  At the firm level, the use of data implies development of professional management of the innovative firm that will be able to respond to problem situations of the modern economy through the formulation of appropriate strategies.

The paper analyzed data from three statistical periods during which the Oslo manual methodology had been applied in Serbia. Analysis has shown that the data obtained in this way are not sufficiently used by decision-makers an occasion rating innovation capacity of enterprises.

Article Details



Aralica, Z., & Račić, D. 2007. „Može li transfer tehnologije objasniti stvaranje izvozne konkurentnosti u Hrvatskoj.“ Tematski zbornik radova XIV naučnog skupa: Tehnologija, kultura i razvoj, održanog 27-30.08.2007. godine u Tivtu.
Aralica, Z., Račić, D. & Radić, D. 2008. „Innovation Propensity in Croatian Enterprises: Results of a Community Innovation Survey.“ South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3 (1): 77-88.
Arrow, K. 1962. „Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention“, Chapter in Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, Volume Author/Editor: Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council: 609-626, (15.09.2015).
Courvisanos, J., & Mackenzie, S. 2014. „Innovation economics and the role of the innovative entrepreneur in economic theory“, Journal of Innovation Economics& Management, Volume 14 (2): 41-61, doi: 10.3917/jie.014.0041.
Draker, P. 2003. Moj pogled na menadžment. Adizes, Novi Sad, str. 298.
Fabris, N. 2014. Ka novom razvojnom modelu Srbije, radni materijal.
Freeman, C. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, The MIT Press. Cambrige, Massachustts.
Furman, L.J., Porter, E.M. & Stern, S. 2002. „The determinants of national innovative capacity.“ Research Policy, 31: 899–933.
Knell, M., et al. 2008. Innovation and growth in the Nordic economic (IGNOREd), NIFU STEP- Norweggian Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.
Knell, M., & Olav, S. 2006. „What is missing in the analysis of input- output relationships of innovation processes?“, presented at the Blue Sky II Forum on „What Indicators for Science, Technlogy and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century?“. Ottawa, Canada, 25-27, September, 2006.
Kell, M., Rojac, M. 2007. „The economic of knowledge and knowledge accumulation: A literature survey“. Understanding the Relationship between Knowledge and Competitiveness in the Enlarging EU.
Lentz, R.,& Mortensen, T.M. 2006. „An empirical model of growth through product innovation.“ Econometrica, 76 (6): 1317–1373.
Lukajanska, R. 2014. „Regional Innovation Policy and System- case of Latvia.“ The Annals of University of Oradea, Economic Sciences, 23 (1): 157-167.
Melinkas, B. 2014. „High technologies sector under the conditions of the European integration: innovative development.“ Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28 – 39.
Maroulis, N., & Tsipouri, L. 2013. RTDI Indicators: RTDI evaluation booklet, working material for Training week for Evaluators, Belgrade: October 07-11.2013.
Mervar, A. 1999. „Pregled modela i metoda istraživanja ekonomskog rasta.“ Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika, 9 (73): 20-62.
Merver, A. 2003. „Esej o novijim doprinosima teoriji ekonomskog rasta.“ Ekonomski pregled, Volum 54 (3-4): 369- 392.
Mohnen, P., Mairesse, J.,& Dagenais, M. 2006. „Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries.“ Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, 15 (4-5): 391-413.
OECD. 2005. Oslo Manuel- The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris, third edition.
Radošević, S. 2004. „A Two- Tier or Multi-Tier Europe Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and East European Countries in the Enlarged EU.“ JCMS, 42 (3): 641-666.
Renate, L. 2014. “Regional Innovation policy and system- case of Latvia.“ The Annals of the University of Oradea.
Romer, M.P. 1990. „Endogenous Technological Change.“ Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 71-102.
Suarez-Villa, L. 1990. „Invention, Innovative Learning, and Innovative Capacity.“ Behavioral Science, Volume 35 (4): 290-310.S
Von Tunzelmann, N.G. 1995. Technology and Industrial Progress. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, England.