The Strange Kind Of Corporate Governance

Main Article Content

Dejan Erić

Abstract

The paper refers to the development of corporate governance phenomenon in the Fed‐ eral Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) during the 1990s of the twentieth century. It is about the country estab‐ lished by disintegration of the former socialist Yugoslavia, which was in the immediate war zone, under the United Nationsʹ sanctions a full eight years and had one of the most undemocratic regimes in the world. In those circumstances, under the influence of factors from external environment, but also in a situation of un‐ finished privatization and transition processes and almost complete centralization of entire social and eco‐ nomic life, the specific forms of corporate governance developed, that did not bear much resemblance to the practice in other countries. Many ex‐socialist countries of the Central and Eastern Europe which at that time were in the initial phases of transition also faced certain ʺchildhood illnessesʺ characteristic of the corporate governance development. That was a logical consequence of the long‐standing existence of socialist systems, absence of private ownership, the real corporations and market economy institutions. Meanwhile, however, it became possible to find adequate solutions too many problems and deviations. In Yugoslaviaʹs case, the oppo‐ site trends and one strange kind of corporate governance have appeared, due to the rise of unusual forms of corporations, uncharacteristic ownership, and specific mechanisms of control and governance. In that situa‐ tion, ʺchildhood illnessesʺ were not adequately cured, but soon began to take on some degenerative forms. Since eventually the necessary political changes were effected in Yugoslavia in 2000, the bases for radical departures from the past and correction of many mistakes and misconceptions were formed. One of them has certainly referred to the departure from the strange kind of corporate governance.  

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Adolf A. Berle and Gardiner C. Means (1932) »The Modern Corporation and Private Property«, Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., New York
2. David O. Beim and Charles W. Calomiris (2001) »Emerging Financial Markets«, McGraw‐Hill, Irwin, Boston
3. »Blic«, Yugoslav newspaper, Belgrade, December 14th, 2002.
4. »How to Fix Corporate Governance« (2002), Business Week – Special Report, May 6, pp. 69‐79
5. »Corporate Governance Rule Proposals«, Reflecting Recommendations from the NYSE Corporate Accountabillity and Listing Standards Committee as Approved by the NYSE Board of Directors August 1, 2002, www.nyse.com  
6. »Encyclopaedia of economics and business« (1994), Savremena administracija, Belgrade
7. Eugene Fama (1980) »Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm«, Journal of Political Economy 88, pp. 288‐307
8. Mark Grinblatt and Sheridan Titman (2002) »Financial Markets and Corporate Strategy«, 2nd edition, McGraw‐Hill, Irwin, Boston
9. Michael Jensen and William Meckling (1976) »The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure«, The Journal of Financial Economics 3, pp. 305‐60
10. Rafael LaPorta, Florencia Lopez‐de‐Silanes and Andrei Shleifer (1999) »Corporate Ownership around the World«, Journal of Finance 54, pp. 471‐517
11. Henry Manne (1965) »Merger and the Market for Corporate Control«, Journal of Political Economy 73, pp. 110‐20
12. Robert A.G. Monks and Nell Minow (1995) »Corporate Governance«, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
13. Alfred Rappaport (1986) »Creating Shareholder Value – the New Standards for Business Performance«, The Free Press, New York
14. Robert M. Sharp (1989) »The Lore and Legends of Wall Street«, Dow Jones – Irwin, Homewood, IL
15. »Company Act« (1992), Official Gazette of FRY, Belgrade