Networks, Aspirations, and Outcomes of Mom Entrepreneurs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores the networks, aspirations, and outcomes of “mom entrepreneurs”, defined in this study as female entrepreneurs actively caring for children (from birth to age 18). Although men and women found businesses at similar rates, the outcomes of businesses started by men and women tend to be dramatically different. This is influenced by many factors, one of which is the role that many women play in child rearing. This study explores the networks of mom entrepreneurs, how mom entrepreneurs define success for themselves and their businesses, and self-reported ratings of success on these measures. More specifically, this paper evaluates the impact of one identifying as a mom entrepreneur, the relation between the size of one’s network and business characteristics and outcomes, and the impact of a spouse’s employment on women’s motivations and aspirations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
Authors reserve the copyright to published articles and have the right to use the article in the same manner like third parties in accordance with the licence Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY NC ND). Thereby they must quote the basic bibliographic data of the source article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, volume, pagination).
References
[2] Bird, B. & Brush, C. 2002. “A Gendered Perspective on Organizational Creation.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 26(3): 41-66.
[3] Brush, C., de Bruin, A. & Welter, F. 2009. “A Gender-Aware Framework for Women's Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 1(1). 8-24.
[4] Burt, R.S. 1997. “The Contingent Value of Social Capital.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339-365.
[5] Buttner, E. & Moore, D. 1997. “Women’s Organizational Exodus to Entrepreneurship: Self-Reported Motivations and Correlates with Success.” Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 34-46.
[6] Caputo, R. & Dolinsky, A. 1998. “Women’s Choice to Pursue Self-Employment: The Role of Financial and Human Capital of Household Members.” Journal of Small Business Management, 36: 8-17.
[7] Change the Story VT. 2016. “Women's Business Ownership and the Vermont Economy: A Status Report.”
[8] Clark-Muntean, S. & Ozkazanc-Pan, B. 2015. “A Gender Integrative Conceptualization of Entrepreneurship.” New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18 (1).
[9] Cross, R., Parise, S., Weiss, L. 2007. “The Role of Networks in Organizational Change.” McKinsey Quarterly.
[10] Danes, S., Stafford, K. & Joy, J. 2007. “Family business performance: The Effects of Genders and Management.” Journal of Business Research, 60: 1058-1069.
[11] Du Rietz, A. & Henrekson, M. 2000. “Testing the Female Underperformance Hypothesis.” Small Business Economics, 14(1): 1-10.
[12] Fazio, C., Guzman, J., Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2016) A New View of the Skew – A quantitative assessment of the quality of American entrepreneurship. MIT Innovative Initiative.
[13] Fischer, E. M., Reuber, A. R., & Dyke, L. S. 1993. “A Theoretical Overview and Extension of Research on Sex, Gender, and Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2): 151-168.
[14] Foss, L. 2010. “Research on Entrepreneur Networks: The Case for a Constructionist Feminist Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(1): 83-102.
[15] Freeman, L.C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks (1): 215-239.
[16] Granovetter, M.S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology (76) 6: 1360-1378.
[17] Hong, H., & Antoncic, B. 2003. “Network-Based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review.” Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 165-187.
[18] Greenslade, L. 2019. “Motherhood+Public Power Index.” New York: USA.
[19] Jennings, J. & Brush, C. 2013. “Research on Women Entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the Broader Entrepreneurship Literature.” The Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 663-715.
[20] Kerr, W., Ramana N., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. 2014. "Entrepreneurship as Experimentation." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (3): 25-48.
[21] Krackhardt, D. 1992. “The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in
Organizations.” Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, 216 - 239.
[22] Korsgaard, S. 2007. “Mompreneurship as a Challenge to the Growth Ideology of Entrepreneurship.” Kontur–Tidsskrift for Kulturstudier, 16: 42–46.
[23] Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. 2007. “The Entrepreneurial Propensity of Women. “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.
[24] Leung, A. 2011. “Motherhood and Entrepreneurship: Gender Role Identity as a Resource.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 3: 254-264.
[25] Marshall, M. & Flaig, A. 2013. “Marriage, Children, and Self-Employment Earnings: An Analysis of Self-Employed Women in the US. Journal of Family Economic Issues (35): 313-322.
[26] Nel, P., Maritz, A. & Thongpravati, O. 2010. “Motherhood and Entrepreneurship: The Mumpreneur Phenomenon.” International Journal of Organizational Innovation. 3: 6-34.
[27] R Core Team. 2017. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
[28] Radovic Markovic, M., Salamzadeh, A., & Kawamorita, H. (2016). Barriers to the Advancement of Women into Leadership Positions: A Cross National Study. International Scientific Conference on Leadership and Organization Development, Kiten, Bulgaria, 16-19 June, 287-294.
[29] Radovic Markovic, M., Salamzadeh, A., & Razavi, S.M. (2013). Women in Business and Leadership: Critiques and Discussions. The 2nd Annual International Conference on Employment, Education, and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade, Serbia.
[30] Reinharz, S., & Davidman, L. 1992. “Feminist Methods in Social Research.” Oxford University Press.
[31] Robb, A. & Watson, J. 2012. Gender Differences in Firm Performance: Evidence from New Ventures in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing. 27(5). 544-558.
[32] Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review (23) 3: 393-404.
[33] Smith, D.A. and Lohrke, F.T. 2008. “Entrepreneurial Network Development: Trusting in the Process.” Journal of Business Research, 61, 315-322.