Maybe He’s Just Better Than You”: Generation X Women and Higher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
The next five years will be significant in international higher education as the baby boomer generation leaves our campuses. What legacy will they leave and how will the next generations manage the ‘leaderist’ turn in universities? This article enters the tight cluster of gender, generation and leadership, and probes how masculine ideologies of achievement, power and recognition can be critiqued and challenged. Recognizing Laura Bates ‘everyday sexism’ project, my piece names the daily structures, stories and scenarios that undermine and minimize women in universities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.
Authors reserve the copyright to published articles and have the right to use the article in the same manner like third parties in accordance with the licence Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY NC ND). Thereby they must quote the basic bibliographic data of the source article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, volume, pagination).
References
[2] Aronowitz,S. (2000). The knowledge factory. Boston: Beacon Press, p. 164-165.
[3] Barsh,J. and Cranston, S. (2011). How remarkable women lead. New York: Crown Publishing, p. 3.
[4] Bates, L. (2014). Everyday Sexism, New York: Simon and Schuster.
[5] Blandford, E. et. al, (2011). Equality in higher education; statistical report 2011. London: HESA – Equality Challenge Unit.
[6] Clark, V., Nelson Garner,S., Higonnet, M., and Katrak, K,(1996). Antifemi-nism in the academy. New York: Routledge.
[7] Clinton, B. (1997). “Remarks to the Women’s Leadership Forum in Las Vegas, Nevada.” Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 33(47 November).
[8] Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought, New York: Routledge, p. 8.
[9] Epstein, J. (1981). Masters: portraits of great teachers. New York: Basic books.
[10] Evans, G. (2000). Play like a man win like a woman. New York: Random House, p. 11.
[11] Eveline, J. (2004). Ivory basement leadership: power and invisibility in the changing university. Crawley: University of Western Australia Press.
[12] Fitzgerald, T. (2014). Women leaders in higher education: Shattering the myths. Abingdon: Routledge, p. 32.
[13] Gardner, S. (2013). “Women faculty departures from a striving institution: be-tween a rock and a hard place,” The Review of Higher Education, 36(3, Spring 2013): 354-356.
[14] Gewirtz, S. and Cribb, A. (2013). Investigated the relationship between these two ideologies in “Representing 30 years of higher education change: UK uni-versities and the Times Higher”. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(1): 58-838.
[15] Hoff Sommers, S. (2000). The war against boys: how misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon and Schuster, p. 14.
[16] Kaseman, D., (1998). “Beyond the double bind: women and leadership.” Women and language, 21(2, Fall 1998).
[17] Krucken, G., Blumel, A. and Kloke, K. (2013). “The managerial turn in higher education? On the interplay of organizational and occupational change in Ger-many Academia.” Minerva, 51: 417-442.
[18] Leathwood, C., (2013). “Re/presenting intellectual subjectivity: gender and vis-ual imagery in the field of higher education.” Gender and Education, 25(2): 133-154.
[19] Leonard, D. (2001). A woman’s guide to doctoral studies. Buckingham: Open University Press, p. 4
[20] Mendell, A. (1996). How men think: the seven essential rules for making it in a man’s world. New York: Fawcett Columbine, p. 37.
[21] Middleton, S., (1992). “Developing a radical pedagogy: autobiography of a New Zealand sociologist of women’s education.” Studying Teachers’ Lives, New York: Teachers College, p. 18.
[22] Morley, L., (2013).“The rules of the game: women and the leaderist turn in higher education.” Gender and Education, 25(1): 116-132.
[23] Orbach, S. and Eichenbaum, L. (1994). Between women: love, envy and competition in women’s friendships. London: Arrow Books.
[24] Pasque,P. and Simpson,E. (2013), “Women’s status in higher education.” The Review of Higher Education, 36(3, Spring 2013): 426.
[25] Prentice, A. and Theobald, M. (1991). “The historiography of women teachers: a retrospect.” In Women who taught: perspectives on the history of women and teaching, eds. A. Prentice and M. Theobald.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 3.
[26] Rosenthal, C., (1997). “A view of their own: women’s committee leadership styles and state legislatures.” Policy Studies Journal, 25(4, Winter 1997).
[27] Segal, S. (1990). “Slow motion: changing masculinities, changing men.” Lon-don: Virago Press, p. 12.
[28] Teelken, C. and. Deem, R. (2014). “All are equal, but some are more equal than others: managerialism and gender equality in higher education in comparative perspectives.” Comparative Education, 49(4): 526.
[29] Thompson, H., Sant Hartig, A., Thurber, D. (2009). “Designing a woman-friendly workplace: a prognosis and prescription for institutional health at the University of Guam.” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 10(4, May 2009).
[30] UNESCO Institute of Statistics. Global education digest (2010): comparing edu-cation statistics across the world (a special focus on gender), Paris: UNESCO.
[31] Wain, J. (2008). C.S. Lewis as a Teacher. p. 238.
[32] Woodward, D. (2007). “Work-life balancing strategies used by women manag-ers in British ‘modern’ universities.” Equal Opportunities International, 26(1): 6-17.