Studying the Barriers of Women’s Progress in the Organization & Its Impact on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: A Case Study at Tehran Tax Organization

Main Article Content

Hassan Darvish
Fatemeh Khamseh
Zahra Temelie Najafi


Research shows that only 14% of women holding managerial posts in Iran. This rate is very low when compared with other countries. In connection with this problem, this paper aims to study the obstacles in women's progress in the organization  and its impact on organizational commitment and job satisfaction of Members of Tehran Tax Organization Staff. For this purpose a comparative method correlation type has been applied. The number of the population sampled based on randomized method is equal to 120 personnel of the said organization. The questionnaire which was used for the purpose of this research is made up of two parts. The first part includes demographic questions and the second part relates to the questionnaires for job satisfaction (α=0.76.8), organizational commitment (α=0.87) and restrictions on the women's progress at the organization (α=0.8492). For the purpose of the qualitative analysis of the general data from the first part of the questionnaire a descriptive statistical method was used and In order to determine the significant relationship between the general questions of the questionnaire and the assumptions of the research the T- Test and Variance Analysis were employed. The findings of this research show that the highest correlation coefficient has related to the relationship between the managers' negative attitude and female gender and the lowest rate was for the relationship between the managers' negative attitude and women's technical skills and abilities. Besides, the results of the correlation coefficient show that the most important factor hindering the women's job promotion are the cultural, socio-cultural and social factors affecting the managers' views and attitude.

Article Details



[1] Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization”. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
[2] Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637–647.
[3] Givariyan. H. (2003). “Women in Management”. Journal of management.103.
[4] Kurman, J. (2001). “Self-enhancement: Is it restricted to individualistic cultures?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1705–1716.
[5] Kurman, J., & Sriram, N. (1997). “Self-enhancement, generality of selfevaluation, and affectivity in Israel and Singapore”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 421–441.
[6] Mdhavan, S. M. 2001. “The J S level of Chinese and Indian born engineering faculty." Research University Dissertation, Engineering Faculty, Morgantown, West Virginia.
[7] Robbins, S. (2005). Esswntials of Organizational Behavior. Translated by A.Parsayan & S.M. Aarabi. Ed 26. Tehran. Centre of Cultural Research.
[8] Robbins, S. (1998). Organizational theory: Structure, design and applications. Translated by M. Alvani & H. Danaee fard. Ed3. Tehran. Saffar.
[9] Robertson, Y. (1998). Introduction to community. Translated by Hossein Behravan. Ed.3.Mashhad.Astan Qod Razavi.
[10] Robertson, I.T., Iles, P.A., Gratton, L. and Sharpley, D. (1991). „The impact of personnel selection and assessment methods on candidates”. Human Relations, 44, 963–982.
[11] Rosner, B. J. (1991). ”Ways women lead”. Harvard Business Review, Academy Of Management Executive, 12(1):105-199.
[12] Saatchi, M.. (2008). Mental Health at Work. Tehran.Virayesh.
[13] Steers, R.M & Porter, L.W (1991). “Motivation And Work Behavior”. Mcgraw-Hill, Inc 5, Th Ed, 1991.
[14] Zafaranchi, L. S. (2008). “Poverty alleviation, sustainable development approach to creating and funding sources for the realization of gender equality and empowerment of women at all levels and all sectors”. The Second Ministerial Conference women OIC member countries. Egypt.